The Urgency of Workplace Dignity

Kendall Isaac • February 28, 2026

Share this article

Not too long ago, I thought the year 2020 was one of the worst ever for employees. We had to tackle COVID-induced isolation, discriminatory animus towards the Asian population, and figuring out how to reconfigure laundry rooms, walk-in closets and dining room tables into functional office spaces. I certainly could not have imagined that 2025 would be immensely worse. 

Let’s make a quick inventory of some of the highlights of last year:


·      DOGE-prompted government agency closures and mass layoffs.

·      Cancel culture attacks on freedom of speech and association, prompting some employers to terminate employees who publicly said anything remotely negative about the Trump Administration – regardless of the truth of the statements made.

·      The marginalization of DEI and transgender initiatives, with claims that such programs were unlawful (or immoral) and supporters would face lost government funding and even lawsuits.

·      The cancellation of visas and criminalization of US-based migrants and immigrants, making it difficult for employers to address labor shortages where the most viable applicants necessitate a visa.


And we thought the angst related to return-to-office mandates were challenging enough?! The slight indignity related to the rebuke of hybrid and remote work modalities by some employers has given way to political issues bleeding into the workplace and, when coupled with oppressive social media bullying campaigns resulting in those who bring unwanted attention to their company getting pushed out, catastrophic indignities ensue. Sometimes one might wonder whether people realize there are lives being significantly impacted. Or does our society simply not care about the lost jobs equating to lost homes and cars, to medical bills going unpaid, to kids having their education disrupted, to mental health issues rising, and even to the possibility of suicides and homicides. I submit that we need to take this moment very seriously because the stakes are excruciatingly high!


But what should an employer do when confronted with a barrage of hate-laced posts, calls, and emails calling for the termination of one of their employees? Having dealt with these situations in the past and in my capacity as general counsel, my first inclination would be to suggest that we slow down and take a breath. Quick decisions often result in poor decisions. Next, we should take the necessary time to review the facts - all the facts. Exactly what did the employee say? Was it true? With what platform was the message conveyed…social media, Zoom, news article? Could a reasonably prudent person believe the employee has the capacity (real or perceived) to speak on behalf of the employer or legally bind it with their words? Are the right people engaged in the decision-making process regarding the employee (i.e. the chief legal officer, chief human resource officer, chief marketing/communications officer, and perhaps the chief executive officer)? And lastly, if the ultimate decision leans towards disciplining the employee, will the process be carried out in a dignified manner? The last question might be the most important one, and I certainly hope that the ultimate decision rests on a just result and not a knee-jerk reaction out of fear of what the vocal irrationals might do to force an injustice of their liking. Lives are at stake. The time is now for employers to do the right thing.

Recent Posts

By Kendall Isaac March 10, 2026
Sometimes we need to tell the truth. You have probably heard it before…truth is a defense to defamation. You have probably heard it before…legal and/or HR says we cannot say anything negative about the departed employee. Both statements make logical sense; both are true in many respects.
By Kendall Isaac March 5, 2026
Some goals are elusive and, once attained, they are difficult to maintain. One of the most elusive goals is weight loss. It can take 3 months to lose 10 pounds, and yet it can take a mere 3 days on vacation to gain it all back. How frustrating! Guess what? Departmental culture can sometimes be just as elusive.
By Kendall Isaac February 14, 2026
Part of expressing dignity to colleagues and customers involves understanding that we are different and unique beings. Behaviors that might be acceptable or expected in one culture may be quite different in another. This is perfectly understandable and okay. As professionals, we must learn to appreciate differences. Pausing to ascertain before overreacting is crucial. Unfortunately, these ideals are not always exemplified in the workplace.
By Kendall Isaac February 13, 2026
In the last post, I shared a disturbing story about how the Washington Post ownership allegedly laid off journalists while they were abroad, leaving them to their own devices to find a way back home. Pondering on this, it reminds me of a story of an Abbott Laboratories employee who went abroad, albeit the ending was a beautiful display of dignity.
By Kendall Isaac February 11, 2026
Amazon has taken an extraordinary step that reduces the reach and influence of the Washington Post, a news publication it acquired a little over a decade ago. About 300 employees, or one-third of its staff, were recently laid off. However, layoffs are nothing new in our profit-first society. It is how certain employees were treated that is shocking.
By Kendall Isaac February 2, 2026
Lawyers play a significant, if not oversized, role when it comes to conflicts. People hire attorneys to help them navigate the conflicts, and the attorneys have a legal obligation to fight for the best interests of their clients. They are to be consummate advocates for the betterment of those they represent. Therefore, it should be an unquestioned fact that lawyers are advocates. But what about the peacemaking role? Is it also applicable to them?
By Kendall Isaac January 22, 2026
When dealing with an employee relations concern, it is easy to look at the people involved. If it is a performance issue, we wonder why the person has decided to underperform, or if the person lacks the skill or education to meet expectations. If it is a conflict between employees, we quickly deduce who is to blame for the breakdown in civility and devise a remedy in accordance with our assessment. This approach makes sense. It works. But is it the best approach?
By Kendall Isaac January 21, 2026
The pursuit of dignity is a noble one. However, the pursuit doesn’t come risk-free. Hilton Hotels franchisee Everpeak Hospitality learned this lesson when it got caught in a firestorm after one of its clerks stated that the hotel would not book rooms for members of ICE or DHS in their Minneapolis Hampton Inn. Given this scenario is a microcosm of the greater turmoil in the city and state following the ICE shooting and killing of a US Citizen, as well as several other concerning interactions with city motorists, an unbiased observer may be able to understand why the hotel clerk made this declaration. After all, it is fairly common for hotels to employee immigrants at their establishments. Any level of DHS activity questioning the immigration status of their employees (or guests) would create a significant hurdle for employee morale and business revenue.
By Kendall Isaac January 21, 2026
The best way to infuse dignity into a workplace culture is for it to be modeled by leadership. If leaders do not treat subordinated, customers, and others with dignity, this behavior (or lack thereof) teaches others that it is fine to ignore, look down upon, or even mistreat those around them.
By Kendall Isaac January 18, 2026
It is incumbent upon institutional leaders to model dignity-infused behaviors when interacting with colleagues and subordinates. Treating others with dignity and respect, everyone along the hierarchical tree, is a positive expression of care, concern, and respect for those who help make companies successful and a joy to show up to on a daily basis. Leaders who miss the mark should be immediate candidates for coaching. Coaching on the merits of empathy and dignity should typically preclude any disciplinary action – giving them the opportunity to fold into the (desired) culture before making the determination that they are ill-fit for the role or the company.
Show More